Most AI calculators are built to produce a range based on the inputs you provide—injury severity, age, treatment timeline, and daily limitations. That can be useful when you’re trying to grasp whether your claim is likely to involve medical costs, lifetime care, rehabilitation, and lost earning potential.
But in Summit, the “real-world” case often turns on details that calculators can’t truly see:
- what the neurologic exams showed and when
- whether imaging and specialist reports consistently support causation
- how quickly you reached stabilization and follow-up care
- whether the record documents specific functional losses (not just diagnosis labels)
In other words, an AI tool can help you organize questions for your attorney—but it can’t replace a record-based valuation.


