AI tools typically work by asking you to enter a few inputs (injury level, age, treatment type) and then returning a range. That can be useful for orientation—but it can miss key realities that Michigan juries and insurers care about.
In practice, an insurer’s evaluation often turns on:
- Whether the record supports causation (that the crash/incident—not something else—caused the neurological injury)
- Whether neurological deficits are documented over time (not just at the initial ER visit)
- Whether future care is tied to a life-care plan rather than assumptions
In other words, the calculator can estimate categories, but it can’t replace the kind of evidence review needed for a Hazel Park case.


