Many AI tools generate a quick range based on simplified inputs—injury severity, age, and claimed damages categories. That can be helpful as a starting point, but it rarely reflects what insurers in Illinois weigh during settlement talks.
In practice, insurers focus on:
- Whether the record supports causation (that the crash/incident caused the neurological injury)
- How documented the functional impact is (mobility, bowel/bladder function, transfers, skin risk)
- Whether future care is supported by credible medical planning
- How liability disputes play out (comparative fault arguments are common in traffic cases)
For Westmont residents, the “why” behind these factors is often straightforward: commuting collisions can produce complicated explanations—delayed symptoms, pre-existing conditions, or conflicting accounts from multiple drivers. An AI output can’t resolve those evidentiary issues.


