In suburban Chicago-area cases, insurers frequently challenge value by disputing one of three things:
- How the injury happened (fault and causation)
- How severe it is (neurological findings and prognosis)
- What life will look like next (lifetime support, therapy, equipment, and home/vehicle accessibility)
That matters because spinal cord injuries are not “one diagnosis, one outcome.” Two people can share a similar label but have very different functional abilities, complication risk, and recovery trajectories—especially when early imaging, emergency documentation, and follow-up care are incomplete.
A calculator can’t replace that evidentiary groundwork.


