Many AI settlement tools generate a range that looks confident—sometimes even “customized.” But those numbers are only as good as the inputs you provide and the assumptions the model uses.
In Albany, the most common reason estimates miss the mark is that the tool can’t see what your doctors see: neurological testing results, functional limitations, complications, and whether your condition is improving, stabilizing, or worsening.
Also, settlement value is shaped by how insurers evaluate risk in Georgia negotiations. Two claims with the same diagnosis can settle far apart depending on:
- how clearly causation is documented (injury event → neurological findings)
- whether the record supports future care—not just the hospital stay
- whether fault is disputed and how evidence is preserved
An AI output can be useful for organizing your questions, but it shouldn’t be treated like a promise.


