AI tools typically build an estimate from general patterns and the inputs you type in. In West Park, that can be a problem because real-world facts often swing value dramatically—like whether the crash involved a commercial vehicle, a distracted driver, unclear lane control, inadequate lighting, or a property hazard.
Common reasons AI estimates fall short in West Park cases:
- Causation questions: Insurers may argue the spinal injury isn’t tied to the crash or fall. If the timeline is contested, the value can change.
- Functional impact is hard to “type in”: The difference between partial impairment and complete paralysis affects medical planning and long-term costs.
- Florida settlement dynamics: Even strong medical proof can face negotiation pressure—especially when liability is disputed or comparative-fault arguments are raised.
Instead of treating an AI number like a promise, use it like a checklist for what your lawyer will need to prove.


