AI tools usually generate a range using inputs like injury severity, age, and future care assumptions. That can help you understand the categories that drive value, but there are reasons the output may not match what negotiations or a court would support—especially after a spinal cord injury.
In Florida, insurers commonly push back on claims by disputing one or more of the following:
- Causation: whether the accident truly caused the neurological damage (not just the initial pain)
- Severity: whether the injury is complete/incomplete and the functional level over time
- Prognosis: whether your condition is stable, improving, or expected to worsen with complications
- Future care needs: whether a life-care plan is realistic or supported
If an AI tool doesn’t have your actual MRI/CT findings, neuro exams, and functional assessments, the estimate may be directionally useful—but unreliable for settlement planning.


