In Elizabeth’s mix of industrial corridors, commercial construction, and high-traffic nearby access routes, insurers frequently argue that the fall “was just an accident” or that the injured worker should have prevented it. They may claim:
- The scaffold was “assembled correctly,” but the person fell because of distraction or misuse
- The injury wasn’t caused by the scaffold condition (even if it happened during scaffold work)
- Safety procedures existed, but weren’t followed by the injured person
To counter this, your case typically needs more than the fact that a fall occurred. It needs proof about what safety measures were (or weren’t) in place at the site, how the scaffold was being used that day, and what caused the fall to become severe.


