Many repetitive stress injury claims stall for the same reasons—especially in Missouri workplaces where documentation practices vary:
- Symptoms get described too late or too vaguely. If you only say “it hurts” without noting what motions trigger it, the defense may argue it’s unrelated.
- Work changes weren’t documented. If your employer adjusted duties, changed staffing, or increased pace, those details can matter.
- Ergonomics get treated like a suggestion, not a safety issue. If you asked for workstation or tool changes and nothing followed, that can strengthen the story of foreseeability and preventability.
- Insurers focus on gaps. When there’s a delay between onset, medical evaluation, and written complaints, opponents may try to disconnect the injury from work.
The goal is to build a clear, consistent record early—so your claim doesn’t depend on guesswork.


