In a Thibodaux claim, the core issue is usually not whether the product was recalled—it’s how your specific injury connects to the hazard described in the recall.
Insurance companies often argue that:
- your product wasn’t actually included in the recall scope,
- the injury came from something else (installation, maintenance, impact damage, or later misuse), or
- the recall happened after the relevant risk already caused harm.
A lawyer’s job is to sort that out using evidence—so your claim is grounded in what happened to you, not just what the internet says about the recall.


