In Tyler, the cases we see often involve conditions that make an attack more likely—especially where people enter and exit after work, during late evening hours, or while walking through poorly lit or loosely controlled areas.
Negligent security generally looks at whether:
- The property had a duty to provide reasonable security for visitors, tenants, or customers.
- The threat was foreseeable (not just a random event).
- The property’s security measures were reasonable for the environment.
- The lack of security was connected to what happened—meaning it contributed to the opportunity for the assault.
This is not about claiming a property guarantees safety. It’s about whether the owner acted like a reasonable operator would have under similar circumstances.


