Negligent security claims aren’t about a guarantee of safety. They’re about whether the risk of harm was reasonably foreseeable and whether the property acted reasonably in response.
In Carlisle, that often means looking closely at conditions that make an incident more likely—especially where people move between parking areas, entrances, and public-facing spaces.
Examples of fact patterns we see in Central Pennsylvania include:
- Assaults or robberies near entrances and parking lots, where lighting, cameras, or access control are inadequate.
- Incidents after hours at businesses with public-facing areas, where staffing or security patrols don’t match the risk.
- Crimes tied to foot traffic—events, evening activity, or crowded periods—where security planning didn’t account for surges in people.
The property’s defense will typically argue the incident was a “one-off” or that it couldn’t have been predicted. Our job is to map the evidence to the legal standard used in Pennsylvania and show why reasonable precautions were warranted.


