Hazelwood sits near major travel routes and commercial corridors, and that reality shows up in how these cases are evaluated. When an incident happens in a place people pass through frequently—parking lots, leasing entrances, loading areas, or outdoor walkways—defendants often argue the crime was random.
Our job is to show it wasn’t. In Hazelwood, we commonly look for evidence that the property should have planned for the kind of risk that was already present in the area, such as:
- Prior police calls or reports tied to the same property or immediate vicinity
- Complaints from tenants, employees, or visitors about lighting, access doors, or loitering
- Security camera gaps (blind spots, outdated systems, broken coverage)
- Doors, gates, or locks that didn’t work as intended—or that were easy to bypass
- Policies that were on paper but not followed during busy arrival or closing times
Missouri courts generally focus on whether the property had a duty to take reasonable steps to protect people from harm that was likely enough to require precautions. The “likely enough” part is where the facts matter.


