In many Freeport cases, the defense focuses on one of three themes:
- “We had security in place.” They point to cameras, lighting, or staff presence.
- “This wasn’t foreseeable.” They argue the incident was a surprise and not something they should have planned for.
- “Our conduct didn’t cause your injuries.” They claim the attacker’s choices broke the chain of causation.
A strong claim usually requires more than saying “the security wasn’t enough.” It needs evidence showing what the property owner knew (or should have known) and what reasonable precautions would have looked like under the circumstances.


