In many Walnut cases, the dispute isn’t whether you hurt—it’s whether the injury is connected to the incident and how long it will realistically affect you.
That matters because insurers commonly look for gaps, such as:
- Treatment delays after a crash or fall
- Inconsistent symptom descriptions between the first visit and later follow-ups
- Limited objective findings compared to what you say you can’t do (bend, sit, drive, lift)
- Confusion about aggravation when someone had prior stiffness or prior imaging
A strong claim is built early: consistent medical notes, a clear timeline, and evidence that matches the way the injury likely occurred.


