AI tools generally use inputs like injury type, treatment duration, and wage loss to generate a rough number. That can be useful when you’re trying to understand whether your claim is likely to be in the low, mid, or high range.
Still, AI doesn’t “see” the facts that insurers fight about—such as how the crash occurred, what evidence exists, whether medical documentation supports causation, and whether fault is contested. Two Heath riders with similar diagnoses can end up with very different outcomes depending on:
- whether police reports and witness accounts clearly describe the collision
- whether the medical record tracks symptoms from day one
- how consistent your statements are across treatment visits and any recorded communications
- whether the case involves disputes about speed, right-of-way, lane positioning, or visibility
Think of an AI estimate as a compass, not a destination.


