AI tools are designed to generate an educated range, not a case outcome. They typically rely on inputs you enter—injury description, treatment timing, and wage loss—to approximate common settlement components.
In practice, the final value in Minot cases turns on things the calculator can’t reliably measure, such as:
- Whether crash evidence still exists in usable form (photos, dash cam, witness statements)
- The consistency between the crash story and the medical record
- Whether the defense argues an alternate cause or disputes the severity of symptoms
- How future care is supported by documentation
A calculator can still be useful—especially if you’re trying to understand which categories (medical bills, treatment duration, work loss, functional impact) tend to matter most. But it shouldn’t be treated like a promise or a substitute for legal evaluation.


