AI tools typically use generalized inputs (injury type, treatment timeline, and reported losses) to produce an estimated range. That can make the process feel less confusing.
In practice, insurers and attorneys evaluate more than the injury label. They focus on:
- What caused the crash (and whether the evidence supports it)
- How quickly injuries were documented after the incident
- Whether medical treatment aligns with the accident timeline
- How the crash affected your ability to work and function day-to-day
In New Jersey, the strength of fault evidence can be especially important in negotiations. Even when you didn’t “intend” to cause a crash, the other side may argue you contributed—based on speed, lane position, or failure to avoid a hazard. Those arguments can meaningfully change settlement value.
So think of AI numbers as a temperature check, not a forecast of what you’ll receive.


