Most AI calculators use the same basic inputs: what happened, the injury types, medical treatment duration, and reported work impact. Then they apply generalized valuation concepts to generate a rough estimate.
In Minnesota, that estimate can diverge from what actually happens because insurers evaluate:
- Fault and causation (who was negligent and how that negligence caused the harm)
- Credibility of the injury story (consistency from crash to medical visits)
- Objective documentation (imaging, follow-up care, functional limitations)
- Treatment stability (whether the medical picture is still changing)
A key difference you’ll see: AI tools may assume a “typical” recovery path. In real Shoreview cases, recovery can be affected by delayed symptom reporting, gaps in therapy, or disputes over whether symptoms match the crash.


