Most AI calculators work by asking you for basic inputs (crash description, injuries, treatment timeline, and work impact) and then applying generalized patterns from past claims.
That can be useful if you’re trying to understand the range of damages categories—medical bills, wage loss, and non-economic harm. But in Cambridge cases, insurers frequently focus on questions like:
- Whether the crash location and timing match the story (especially when there’s limited lighting or changing road conditions)
- Whether the injuries align with what was documented early
- Whether comparative fault applies (for example, disputes about speed, lane position, or lookout)
A calculator can’t evaluate scene evidence, credibility, or Minnesota fault arguments the way a lawyer can. Treat it as a starting point—not a prediction of your outcome.


