AI tools typically generate a rough range by combining inputs like injury type, treatment timing, and claimed losses. That can be helpful for understanding which categories tend to influence totals.
However, insurers and adjusters don’t evaluate claims by “AI math.” They evaluate evidence, credibility, and causation. In Elkton cases, an estimate often misses what becomes decisive in negotiations:
- Whether fault is provable (for example, a turn/yield dispute at an intersection)
- Whether your medical timeline holds together (consistent complaints and treatment)
- Whether symptoms are supported by objective findings
- Whether pre-existing conditions are being blamed instead of the collision
Treat an AI number as a starting point for questions—not a substitute for a case review.


