Misdiagnoses rarely arrive with a label that says “this was caused by an algorithm.” Instead, they often appear as a chain of small failures—some human, some system-based—that add up.
In Terre Haute and surrounding areas, common patterns include:
- ER-to-discharge missteps: A patient is discharged with instructions that don’t match the seriousness of the findings, and a key test result isn’t escalated or followed up.
- Imaging workflow breakdowns: Reports may be delayed, partially reviewed, or not clearly communicated to the ordering clinician—especially when symptoms change after the scan.
- Lab and follow-up gaps: Abnormal results are posted but not acted on quickly, or follow-up appointments don’t occur soon enough to prevent deterioration.
- Automated triage routing: If symptoms are categorized in a risk tool and the patient is routed to the wrong level of care, delays can compound.
When AI or automated tools are part of these workflows, the central question becomes: Was the tool treated as advisory, and were clinicians required to verify and escalate when facts conflicted? A good legal investigation focuses on that decision-making process—not just the final diagnosis.


