Most AI or online calculators use simplified inputs (injury severity, length of treatment, bills, and general categories like pain and suffering). That approach breaks down when a case turns on details like:
- whether clinicians documented symptoms and decision-making clearly
- whether follow-up instructions were given and followed
- how quickly a provider responded when a patient’s condition changed
- whether diagnostic tests were ordered, interpreted, or escalated appropriately
In Minnesota, malpractice claims typically rise or fall on standard of care and causation, supported by medical records and, often, expert review. A tool can’t replace that evidentiary backbone.


