Most AI or online settlement estimate tools use simplified inputs: the type of injury, how long recovery took, medical bills, and sometimes non-economic harm (like pain and suffering).
That can feel reassuring, but it often misses the details that decide outcomes in Minnesota cases, such as:
- Whether the chart shows the right symptoms and timing (and whether those notes are consistent)
- Whether the provider’s actions match what a reasonably careful clinician would have done in the same circumstances
- Whether later treatment clearly ties back to the earlier mistake (medical causation)
- Whether your losses can be supported with records—not just described
If you’re dealing with ongoing symptoms, missed work, or a long rehab timeline, the calculator may provide a range that’s too broad—because it doesn’t “see” the proof.


