AI and online tools generally estimate damages by using broad categories like medical bills, future treatment, and non-economic harm (pain, limitations, emotional impact). That approach can feel reassuring because it turns something overwhelming into a structured “range.”
In real Michigan medical negligence cases, however, the value often turns on questions a form can’t ask:
- Was the standard of care met for the symptoms, setting, and timeline?
- Did the provider’s actions cause the harm, rather than another medical explanation?
- What documentation exists (imaging reports, notes, medication records, referral history, follow-up compliance)?
- How clearly can experts connect the chart to the injury?
Even two patients with similar outcomes may see very different settlement leverage if one case has stronger causation evidence or better documentation.


