Many online tools give a single projected range based on a few inputs (injury type, treatment length, and reported damages). That can feel helpful—until you realize how often the outcomes that matter most are missing from a form.
In Illinois, two cases that look similar on paper can settle very differently if:
- The medical record supports (or contradicts) the timeline of symptoms
- Causation is disputed (whether the alleged negligence actually caused the harm)
- Pre-existing conditions are involved
- The provider’s documentation shows a different story than the patient’s recollection
- The case depends on expert testimony to establish the standard of care
So instead of treating an AI output like a target, use it as a checklist for what you’ll need to prove.


