AI tools can be helpful for understanding what categories of damages may be discussed in a settlement (like medical bills and non-economic harm). In Weston, however, the difference between a low offer and a fair resolution usually comes down to evidence quality, not math.
A calculator can’t reliably account for:
- whether the dog’s behavior was previously known to the owner,
- how quickly you sought treatment and how infection risk was addressed,
- whether photos and medical notes consistently match the injury pattern,
- whether the defense disputes causation (for example, arguing the wound wasn’t from the dog bite).
So think of AI output as a starting conversation, not a settlement promise.


