AI tools often take a few inputs—injury type, treatment timeline, and whether there are lasting effects—and then generate a range. That can be useful when you’re trying to grasp what categories of harm matter and how insurers might frame “value.”
But in Kent, the most important part is usually not the tool—it’s what you can prove afterward:
- Treatment timing (did you get care right away, or was there a delay?)
- Documentation quality (did medical notes describe the wound in enough detail?)
- Scene evidence (photos, witness contact info, and incident reports)
- Consistency of the story (does your account match medical records?)
An AI estimate can’t verify those items. A lawyer can.


