Many AI tools generate a range based on general patterns—injury severity, treatment length, and whether there was visible scarring. That can be useful for planning conversations, but Everett cases often hinge on issues that calculators don’t “see,” such as:
- Who had control of the dog at the time (owner, tenant, property manager, or someone temporarily responsible)
- Whether the bite occurred in a setting that affects liability (shared apartment common areas, leased property, or a visit to a friend/relative)
- How quickly and consistently treatment was documented after an attack
- Whether the dog’s prior behavior was known and whether that knowledge can be proven
When adjusters believe causation or responsibility is unclear, they may push for lower value—regardless of what a calculator suggested.


