Most AI tools work by taking your answers and mapping them to typical settlement ranges. That can be useful for understanding categories of harm (like medical bills or scarring). But in real Richmond cases, insurers focus on questions like:
- Was the dog’s behavior foreseeable? (Prior complaints, prior incidents, or notice)
- Who had control of the animal at the time?
- What do the medical records actually say? (Wound description, treatment timeline, infection risk, and follow-up care)
- How consistent is the story across photos, witnesses, and intake notes?
A calculator may assume a clean liability picture. Your Richmond case may not be so straightforward.


