AI tools generally work by taking the information you enter (injury severity, treatment timeline, whether surgery was needed, and similar inputs) and mapping it to typical outcomes. That can be useful for planning questions, but it often misses how settlements actually change when:
- Liability is contested (common when an owner disputes what happened, or suggests the dog was provoked)
- Medical documentation is incomplete early on (which can happen if someone delays follow-up after the first visit)
- Tennessee claim handling focuses on proof—not just reported symptoms
- Comparative fault issues are raised (even minor arguments about your actions can affect negotiation)
In other words, an AI range may be directionally helpful, but your settlement value is built around what can be supported.


