An AI tool is generally good for one thing: helping you organize damage categories so you know what to gather after a bite. It can also help you estimate how different facts—like treatment intensity or visible scarring—may influence settlement ranges.
However, an AI estimate can mislead when:
- The injury severity isn’t fully documented early (common when people wait to confirm whether wounds become infected).
- Liability is disputed (e.g., the owner claims the dog was provoked or that the bite didn’t match the medical timeline).
- The case involves multiple locations (bite happened outdoors, treatment happened elsewhere, witness statements differ).
- The “non-economic” impact is real but hard to prove without medical/therapy documentation.
In other words: treat AI as a starting point, not a promise of what you’ll receive.


