After an on-site injury, it’s common for the responsible party to argue one (or more) of the following:
- The hazard was “obvious” (so the injured person should have avoided it)
- The site was under someone else’s control (general contractor vs. subcontractor)
- The injury wasn’t caused by the work conditions (medical causation disputes)
- Safety steps were taken (training logs, inspections, or corrective actions)
In practice, these disputes hinge on what can be proven quickly—before memories fade and before site conditions change. In Aberdeen, where job activity can be steady and sites turn over, the timeline matters.


