An AI tool typically works by asking you questions about the burn type, treatments you received, whether you missed work, and how your scarring or symptoms have affected daily life. Based on those inputs, it may generate a rough range meant to mirror patterns seen in past cases. For people in New York trying to get through a stressful recovery, this can feel helpful because it replaces “guessing” with structure.
But the limitation is just as important. A calculator cannot see the burn photographs in your medical file, cannot interpret operative reports or dermatology notes, and cannot determine whether your injury pattern matches the way the accident happened. Burn injuries can worsen, and complications can appear later—hypertrophic scarring, nerve pain, range-of-motion problems, infection risk, and sometimes additional procedures. Automated estimates rarely account for that uncertainty in a way that would hold up in real negotiations.
In practice, the value of your claim is tied to what your records show and how well the evidence supports causation. If the documentation is incomplete, insurers may argue that your symptoms are unrelated, exaggerated, or not supported by treatment notes. That is why many people in New York who relied on an early estimate later discover their settlement demand required a more detailed medical narrative.


