Online tools can be useful for organizing questions, but they often miss the details that matter most in burn cases—especially where Michigan insurers focus on proof.
Common ways AI estimates go wrong:
- They assume a burn healed predictably when your treatment required follow-up care, scar management, or additional procedures.
- They undercount functional impact (hand sensitivity, restricted motion, difficulty performing job tasks) that shows up in therapy notes.
- They don’t account for causation disputes—for example, whether the burn pattern matches the way the incident was described.
- They can’t evaluate credibility—such as gaps in records, delayed reporting, or inconsistent documentation that adjusters may try to exploit.
If you received a number that seems too low or too high, that’s not the end of the story. It’s a sign you likely need a legal review of what the estimate did—and didn’t—consider.


