Most AI tools for burn cases generate a range based on inputs like burn type, treatment, and time off work. That can be helpful as a starting point, but it’s not a substitute for a legal evaluation.
Why? Because in real burn cases, the value hinges on details AI often can’t verify, such as:
- How deep the burn is (and whether it worsened after the initial injury)
- Whether grafting, scar revision, or long-term wound care is expected
- Functional limits—like grip strength, range of motion, or hypersensitivity—that affect your ability to work
- The strength of evidence that links the burn to the specific incident
In Massachusetts, insurers scrutinize documentation and consistency. If the record doesn’t line up—timeline, treatment, or causation—an early “rough range” can become misleading fast.


