AI tools often estimate settlement value by taking general patterns from other injury cases. That can be helpful for thinking about categories of losses, but in real burn cases, small differences can shift value dramatically.
In Calhoun, we frequently see these proof gaps:
- Burn depth and progression aren’t fully known yet. What looks minor early can worsen, or complications can appear after discharge.
- Treatment records are incomplete or inconsistent—for example, missing follow-ups after an ER visit.
- Function is underestimated. Hand burns, burns affecting mobility, or sensitivity to touch can limit daily life and job duties even if the skin looks “healed.”
- Georgia claim timelines and insurer pressure lead people to respond quickly—sometimes before they understand long-term needs.
A tool may suggest a range, but it can’t review your operative reports, wound care notes, scar treatment recommendations, or your work restrictions.


