Many calculators work by asking for broad inputs (burn type, treatment, scarring, time missed from work). In practice, insurers don’t decide claims based on a “range”—they decide based on whether the proof supports (1) liability, (2) causation, and (3) documented losses.
For burns, that proof is rarely just a single ER visit. In Marion and across Arkansas, adjusters commonly scrutinize whether the medical timeline matches the incident description and whether the treatment plan reflects the burn’s depth and location. A tool can’t verify:
- whether your burn progression was consistent with the reported cause
- whether follow-up care (wound care, therapy, scar management) was medically necessary
- whether functional limits affect work duties (including modified duty scenarios)
Bottom line: treat an AI estimate as a starting point for questions—not as a prediction of what an Arkansas insurer will pay.


