Broken bone injuries from traffic and pedestrian incidents are frequently mischaracterized in the first weeks. In Clayton, that often shows up as:
- “It wasn’t caused by the crash” arguments—especially when swelling or symptoms seem to change over time.
- Comparative fault pressure—adjusters may claim you “should have seen” a vehicle or that you were partly responsible for a slip, stumble, or crossing.
- Unclear documentation—if the first medical visit didn’t include detailed findings, insurers may argue the fracture is unrelated or overstated.
You don’t have to prove your entire case alone. The goal is to prevent preventable gaps—missing records, inconsistent timelines, or statements that weaken causation.


