Many patients first hear about “AI” when they receive summaries from electronic systems, automated reports, or platform-generated timelines. Even when the care team used technology to streamline documentation, Georgia law still centers on whether clinicians met the standard of care.
In practical terms, Perry cases often stall at the same points:
- Timeline confusion: charts that show medication orders, but not the full sequence of monitoring events
- Inconsistent entries: vitals or anesthesia notes that don’t line up with monitor trends
- Delayed responses: questions about how quickly abnormal readings were recognized and acted on
Our job is to help you identify where technology may have affected the record—while keeping the legal focus on what the care team did (and what a reasonably careful clinician would have done).


